Action from the World Health Organisation and IARC:
On 31st May 2011, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency (RF) radiation as Group 2b ‘Possibly carcinogenic to humans’ and extremely low frequency ELF radiation was previously classified in the same group.

WHO-classificationNo other environmental carcinogen has produced evidence of an increased risk in just one decade 2. Other agents in this classification include lead, DDT, diesel fumes and chloroform.

Accompanying this warning from WHO are warnings from medical doctors groups 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16, scientific panels 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28, teaching unions 29 30 31 32 33 34, parliamentary assemblies 35 36 and other governments globally 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46. Many of those on the IARC panel and other scientists have since publicly voiced their belief that the category should have been Group 2A ‘Probably carcinogenic to humans’ 47 48 49 50 51, or Group 1 ‘Carcinogenic to humans’ 52 53 54.

This is justified in part, by the fact that acoustic neuroma and glioma (a rapidly progressive fatal brain cancer) satisfy the Hill criteria for causality from radiofrequency (RF) exposure 55. Disturbingly, brain tumours have now overtaken leukaemia as the leading cause of cancer death in children and both of these cancers have been associated with EMR exposures in peer-reviewed, scientific publications.

The comet assay featured below demonstrates DNA fragmentation from non-thermal exposure levels of EMR generated from real devices. The length and density of the comet like tail emanating from the DNA allows a quantitative assessment of damage.

Thank you to Professor Franz Adlkofer

Thank you to Professor Franz Adlkofer

Note: this 2b classification applies to all RF frequencies, and is therefore relevant to all devices.

References

1. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Press Release No. 208, 31 May 2011

2. Devra Lee Davis et al, 2013, Pathophysiology Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2013 P 123-129. Swedish review strengthens grounds for concluding that radiation from cellular and cordless phones is a probable human carcinogen

3. 2015, Brussels International Scientific Declaration on EHS and MCS

4. Belyaev et al, 2016, Rev Environ Health. 2016 Sep 1;31(3):363-97. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses.

5. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (60,000 Pediatricians and Pediatric Surgeons). Letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), August 2013.

6. American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM). Statement on AAEM’s position on EMF radiation.
The AAEM Statement on WiFi in Schools (Approved by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine Board of Directors on October 3, 2012.)

7. International Society (17 countries) of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) and Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA) recommendations: Statement on Electromagnetic [radio frequency] Radiation [EMR] and Health Risks

8. Cyprus Medical Association, the Vienna / Austrian Medical Chambers and the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health: Nicosia Declaration on Electromagnetic Fields / Radiofrequencies, Nov 2017 Common Position Paper

9. German Doctors Freiburger Appeal in 2002 and 2012. Radio-frequency Radiation Poses a Health Risk. Physicians Demand Overdue Precaution.

10. Swiss Physicians for the Environment (MfE).

11. The Austrian Medical Chamber (Österreichische Ärztekammer, ÖÄK ) 40,000 doctors

12. Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA)

13. Declaration: Doctors Call for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure  (signed by over 50 MDs)

14. Hedendahl, Carlberg and Hardell, 2015, Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):209-15. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity – an increasing challenge to the medical profession

15. Di Ciaula, A. 2018 Apr ISDE Scientific Office. International Society of Doctors for Environment 5G networks in European Countries: appeal for a standstill in the respect of the precautionary principle.

16. Physicians for Safe Technology. Excerpts from ‘Executive Summary Wireless Technology and Public Health’ 2018 May 20
 
17. BioInitiative Report, 2012.

18. International EMF Scientists Appeal

19. Oceania Scientific Advisory Association

20. Seletun Panel, 2009.

21. The Porto Alegre Resolution, 2009, ICEMS (International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety).

22. Venice Resolution, 2008, ICEMS (International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety).

23. Benevento Resolution, 2006, ICEMS (International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety).

24. Vienna Resolution, Austria 1998, ICEMS (International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety)

25. Salzburg Resolution on Mobile Telecommunication Base Stations, Austria 2000

26. Catania Resolution Catania Resolution, Italy 2002 

27. London resolution, 2007. Johansson, Pathophysiology 16 (2009) 247–248

28. Helsinki Appeal, 2005.

29. Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), 2009. ATL Conference 2009, 8 April 2009, Resolutions

30. The UK Trades Union Congress (TUC) Occupational Cancer document, updated Feb 2012.

31. The Voice Teaching Union, 2013. Talking Point: Wi-fi in Schools, Feb 2013.

32. Canadian Teachers’ Federation, 2013 (over 200,000 teachers across Canada)
Brief to the expert panel of the Royal Society of Canada reviewing Safety Code 6
A Canadian Teachers’ Federation Brief on Wi-Fi exposure in Canadian classrooms, October 2013

33. Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association (OECTA)
A position regarding the use of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation, including WiFi , in the workplace

34. United Federation of Teachers (represent approximately 75,000 teachers and 19,000 classroom paraprofessionals, along with out school workers in New York City public schools and a number of private educational institutions). Wireless radiation

35. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1815 (2011), Draft Resolution

36. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1815 (2011), Final Resolution

37. Cyprus Government ban on Wi-Fi in nursery schools and halted in elementary schools

Video from the Government subtitled in English (thanks to EHT)

38. French National Assembly, January 29 2015
Draft law on sobriety, transparency, information and consultation for exposure to electromagnetic waves. (Final text)

39. French National Assembly, March 2013

40. Israeli Ministry of Education recommendations, August 2013
Section 4, Radiation systems guidelines WLAN, Wi-Fi and end devices used teachers and students
Interpretation of the recommendations.

41. Swiss Government Information Document, Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscapes SAEFL. Electrosmog in the environment, 2012

42. German Federal Ministry for Radiation Protection recommends against Wi-Fi in schools, 2007.

43. Russian National Committee on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection RCNIRP, 2012.
Recommendations of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection of the necessity to regulate strictly the use of Wi-Fi in kindergartens and schools

44. ANSES (French Government Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health)
Update of the “Radiofrequencies and health” expert appraisal , 15 October 2013

45. ARPANSA (Australia Radiation Protection & Nuclear Safety Agency)
Fact Sheet 14 (Updated August 2013), How to reduce exposure from mobile phones and other wireless devices

46. Belgium, The Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment
Press Release, Sept 2013, ‘Ban on mobile phones for children on the way

47. Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski, Research Professor at STUK (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland) and member on the May 2011 Expert Panel of the World Health Organization’s International Agency on the Research of Cancer (IARC).
Children with Cancer Scientific Conference, 2012. Session 8.
Presentation ‘Possible mechanism of cell phone radiation-induced brain cancer’ (Video, quote at approx 26 minutes)

48. Devra Lee Davis et al, 2013, Pathophysiology Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2013 P 123-129
Swedish review strengthens grounds for concluding that radiation from cellular and cordless phones is a probable human carcinogen

49. Dr. Annie Sasco, Teaching fellow of Harvard University and former Chief of the World Health Organization’s Cancer Control Programme.

50. Symposium on Health Issues Associated with the Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Microwave Radiation
Held for Canadian Medical Doctors and Health Care Practitioners
Presented by C4ST and Women’s College Hospital, Toronto – September 12, 2014

51. International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety, Position Paper on the Cerebral Tumor Court Case, 2012

52. Hardell and Carlberg, 2013, Rev Environ Health 2013
Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluation strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones

53. Carlberg & Hardell, Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 16;11(10):10790-805.
Decreased survival of glioma patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile and cordless phones.

54. Peleg et al, 2018, Environ Res. 2018 May;163:123-133. Radio frequency radiation-related cancer: assessing causation in the occupational/military setting.

55. Philips et al (2018), Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2018 Apr 21.
Brain tumours: rise in Glioblastoma Multiforme incidence in England 1995–2015 suggests an adverse environmental or lifestyle factor.

Author of page Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, see credits for graphics owners. If you wish to use or discuss any content from this site, please contact the relevant author / owner either directly or via ‘contact’ above.

image_print